Username: 
 Password:

Posted Jan 5, 2006 12:00 by Dan E. Listed in: iPod, News Tags: Sandisk
Ó
0QJ

It had to happen -- a Nano clone. There was just no way around it, we checked. The force of giving in to copying a proven model is just too much and Samsung and SanDisk have given in like good Catholic girls at the prom.

Enter Samsung's YP-Z5 and SanDisk's Sansa e200, two players that tweak on the Apple model just enough so as to keep Sue-e Steve away. Samsung's model even comes in identical capacities, two and four gigabytes of flash coupled with a size almost identical to the Nano. Where the Samsung model exceeds, though, is in the reported battery life -- a staggering 38 hours in comparison to Apple's 14-hour claims.

SanDisk, on the other hand, is now reporting 128 hours, a hard-to-believe claim. We'll have to see if those numbers stay true when SanDisk prepares to ship its product in March. Samsung should be good to go in February.

[Via, The Register]



Permalink  |   Email this  |   Linking Blogs   |   Digg It!

Bookmark / Find this article on:

1 Comments


Sort by:
by Advertising -

   
   by IntegTypeR (Unregistered) - 1999-11-30

LId buy the Skandisk it looks much slicker and cleaner.





You appear as unregistered user now. To change this, you must register or login



Post new comment  Submit a trackback URL
You can't post comments anymore on this article!


powered by
QJ.NET Blog Network RSS Feeds
MyQJ Feed / PDA
MyQJ RSS / PDA
Blog of Blogs Feed / PDA
QJ.NET RSS / PDA
Gaming Consoles Feed / PDA
Nintendo DS RSS / PDA
PlayStation 3 RSS / PDA
PSP Updates RSS / PDA
Wii RSS / PDA
Xbox 360 RSS / PDA
PC Gaming Feed / PDA
Games for Windows RSS / PDA
MMORPG RSS / PDA
Tabula Rasa RSS / PDA
World of Warcraft RSS / PDA
Science Feed / PDA
Science RSS / PDA
Technology Feed / PDA
Apple RSS / PDA
Gadgets RSS / PDA
Mobile RSS / PDA
Photography RSS / PDA
User Favorites - January
Most Commented
No available articles!
User Favorites - January
Top Jumps
No available articles!